Is Goldman-Sachs still is business?

Question

I just received an email from their senior principal recruiter and they said that someone forwarded my resume to them for a financial adviser position. I've never done that before but I've been unemployed for over a year and am up for anything. Their senior principal recruiter works for Brentwood Marketing in Barbados and is asking me to send back the application immediately so that they can complete the background check. I just have to supply a credit card number and my checking account number so that they can do a credit check.

I thought that Goldman-Sachs went under during the recession. I guess they made a comeback. Are they still in business/ or a good name to work for anymore?

Answer 1

Gs is around. However, do not send anything to Barbados. This is scam. Throw it away. Do Not give them your ss, credit card or any financial info. Scam

Answer 2

Are you an idiot? Barbados? My 15 year old brother wouldn't be stupid enough to fall for that one. Sorry for being harsh.

Answer 3

because expenditures are not the in easy words aspect that confirm the taxes that agencies pay. it really is totally genuine of financing agencies. Your link says that the helpful tax cost grow to be so low because GS " diminished its cost with more suitable tax credit as a percentage of income and thanks to “variations in geographic income blend,” the corporation reported. What meaning in undeniable English is that Goldman grow to be operating more suitable of its financing transactions--and for this reason grow to be earning interest--in different jurisdictions besides the U.S. If GS grow to be taxed in overseas international locations on its financing transactions, then it received overseas tax credit (less than sections 901 and 902 of the tax code) with appreciate to those overseas taxes. yet another aspect that benefited them grow to be something referred to as the "portfolio interest exception," which in reality helps US agencies that earn "portfolio interest"--interest on particular kinds of investments--no longer to be taxed in any respect contained in the U. S.. US agencies might want to have the utmost bottom-line tax cost, in spite of the indisputable fact that it would not keep on with that they truly pay more suitable taxes to the U. S. than agencies in different international locations. it really is only a conservative delusion. there are the form of lot of loopholes and dodges outfitted into the U. S. company tax (as for this reason helpful lobbying through agencies) that maximum agencies in fact pay some distance below agencies in different international locations.